It must be irritating a lot of people by now. I mean, the Manny Villar ads. They have pulled out all the stops – even asserting that Manny Villar’s campaign is ‘pro-life’. But, in a final spiel before the elections on Monday, I would like to analyze his entire campaign – and why it blatantly says ‘more of the same order’.
Look at his three of his male endorsers.
Why did I pick these three?
It is not a monetary coincidence that these three came to support Manny Villar. For they represent the world of the past nine years – and the past seventy, if you will.
I said in my previous post “Dangerous and Typical” that Manny Villar is the Pinoy Everyman. Of course, gathering with the Pinoy Everyman are the facets of the Pinoy Everyman through the years: Willie Revillame, Manny Pacquiao, and Dolphy.
Willie Revillame. We all know his antics. He is, to be sure, a ‘naughty’ guy. People watch him on Wowowee, they see him make fun of the katulong and the lola and the bading. Of course, making fun of the bading in mass media is an idea that was not developed by him, but by Dolphy. (Later.) We also see him groping unsuspecting women and girls. And we hear his songs which have double entendre – and on that basis alone, I would be surprised if Andrew E had NOT endorsed Manny Villar.
But I was talking about Willie. ‘Tis true, they say, Willie is like Manny V. He has his own business ventures. He has lots of money. And the very economic class that he has ripped off (albeit not economically but socially), the poor, love him, just like Manny V.
Of course, they have similar alibis for their actions. Manny Villar says that the people benefited from the C-5 Extension Project, which went through Villar properties, greatly increasing their value. Willie Revillame says that the people benefited from Wowowee, which served as the stage for his making fun of the poor, greatly diminishing their value and reducing them to the status of beggars, that is, dancing/singing outrageously for money.
In fairness to Manny V, he has not cheated in his personal life. That is why Willie Revillame is not enough to endorse Manny V; else, Manny V would just have been packaged as another Erap when he clearly isn’t. Not cool.
Manny Pacquiao. One of the reasons why Manny P is supporting Manny V is that they share this type of rags-to-riches life story. Manny P did come from a poor family. His only salvation, it turned out, was in boxing, in using his fists. And so he went on to win seven titles, unprecedented in the history of boxing – and for a Filipino boxer. We ought to applaud him, except that we feel we could not. Why? Because his victories are spun by government as yet another demeaning of the technocratic dream we hoped for the Philippines.
In layman’s terms: Is boxing the only way we could prosper in life? Is being a jock the only way to get ahead? There we are, back in high school once again.
Manny V was not a jock, but he was shrewd and opportunist. Which gives the above question more pathos, and turns it into: Do we really need to fight and outsmart people just to get ahead?
In my mind, the Pacman’s endorsement of Manny V poses this question to the Philippines, and gives us a ready-made answer: YES, it is the only way to get ahead. Because we have had enemies that we cannot fight, and we have to compensate by fighting everyone but the real object of our hatred. And so we devise loopholes in the law, we look for loopholes in the law, we steal from the people. All because we cannot face, cannot take, the tasks we have to do for the real good of the country. We shadow-box because we cannot fathom an upheaval because we are too indolent and lazy.
Manny P excites the Filipino imagination because he fights in matches and we take his victories as victories over people who have enslaved and demeaned our country in the past (the Spaniards, Americans, Japanese, Chinese, et al.). That’s why people tune in to his fights and hope that we would win. We are like a pitiful man who, not being able to get a woman to sleep with him, stacks up on porn and realizes his fantasies with his magazines instead. We can’t take action against the Chinese in the Spratlys, the Japanese in the Second World War, and the Americans in the Philippine-American War, so we look to Flash Elorde, Bong Coo, Paeng Nepomuceno and Manny Pacquiao to somehow ‘recoup’ the losses sustained. Shadow-boxing.
Manny Villar seems to foster this line of thinking. He promises to stop poverty, as many politicians have done. He actually wants to only replace the screen where the shadow falls so we can box with the shadow again AND convince ourselves that it is a different shadow.
Dolphy. We were stunned to see Dolphy endorse Manny V. Wasn’t Dolphy a remnant of the glorious Magsaysay-Macapagal era? Didn’t he make his name during that time? Why is he supporting this man? Shouldn’t he be supporting Erap or Noynoy?
But we came to enlightenment after a careful meditation of the past seventy years of the country that was Unitary Philippines. Turns out that the support Dolphy gives Manny V is continuous with his past.
Dolphy is the arch-basher of the bading in media, as I told you earlier. (I did choose this photo of Dolphy, didn’t I?) He makes fun of homosexuals and portrays them in embarrasing roles. You may ask: Jeremy, are you gay? Why are you railing against Dolphy’s gay-bashing?
I am not gay, and I quote Voltaire: “I may not agree with what you have said but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” This goes for the gay community and their being gay. It’s their choice to be so.
But gay-bashing is one indication of a society’s immaturity. A society is immature if it makes fun or satirizes (or bothers to make fun or satirize) the minorities. We are an immature society through and through: In Manila we satirize the Bisaya, the Ilonggo, the Bikol, the Ilokano, the Muslim, the Born-Again, the bading, the tomboy, the baliw, etc. In Sugbo we satirize the Tagalog, the Ilokano, the Waray, the Muslim, the Born-Again, the bayot, the lakin-on, the binuang, etc. And Dolphy has been the poster boy for such behavior. Of course, he redeemed himself with Markova, but too late. A host of male stars have by that time carried his gay-bashing legacy.
Do not get me wrong – I admire him for his Home along the Riles, but even there he sticks to what he does best – slapstick comedy. Slapstick is good for entertainment.
But the present endorsement of Manny V by him turns the campaign into a farce of grand proportions. It’s as if, under Manny V, we would get six more years of an immature society. Not only a government who know how to excuse themselves when caught red-handed in deep corruption, but also a society that is inane, content with shadow-boxing, making fun of its minorities, and dancing/singing for money.
Of course, you can just say: Jeremy, shut up already!
But if I do not speak out, the stones will. 😀